Research finds low-pitched people have strong appeal and leadership
Core tip: The voting motivations proposed by the test subjects are different, but the bass version beats the treble version with a clear advantage and becomes more likely to be trusted by “voters”. Men with low voices usually have more offspring than men with higher voices.
Researchers from the Department of Psychology at McMaster University in Canada recruited 125 volunteers to play archived recordings of nine US presidents, and processed each president’s voice into two versions: treble and bass.
Subjects scored each voice for attractiveness, leadership, sincerity, intelligence, and dominance as required, and finally selected the voice who was willing to vote for him in peace or war.
The results show that the correct motive for voting is different for the test subjects, but the bass version beats the treble version with a clear advantage, making it easier to win the trust of “voters”.
In the second experiment, researchers brought in another 40 people and listened to them as ordinary men.
As a result, subjects also voted for people with low voices.
Another survey of the results of the US presidential election from 1960 to 2000 also showed that in eight elections, the candidates who entered the White House last year were those with relatively low voices.
The research report was published on the 14th by the journal Evolution and Human Behavior.
“Research shows that voters vote for (candidate’s) voice factors when they vote,” said Carla Teague, a PhD student in the department of psychology at McMaster University.
“Previous research has shown that a low voice is a reflection of higher levels of retinal pill hormones.
Teague said that a low voice is seen as a combination of attraction and dominance, so when choosing a leader, people can’t help but choose the low voice.
“In evolutionary history, human ancestors chose various hints for leaders, especially related leadership, because that reflects a person’s ability to point out the tribe’s ability to survive and reproduce.”
”Even in modern times, this is still the case,” she said. Taking the former British Prime Minister, Mrs. Margaret Thatcher, the “Iron Lady”, for example, she was trained to make her voice less sharp, which attracted her.More voters.
The study also showed the value of attractiveness and perception of candidate dominance over the voting decisions made by voters.
Professor David Feinberger directed the research.
“People think they want to vote for someone with a low voice because that person is attractive.
But that’s actually because the elect felt his dominant power subconsciously.
“The wonder of the voice doesn’t stop there.
A study by Gillian O’Connor, a PhD student in the School of Psychology, Neurology, and Behavior at McMaster University, shows that low-pitched men and high-pitched women are attractive.
In women’s eyes, men with low voices trick their partners slightly more; in men’s eyes, women with high voices have less loyalty to their partners.
A 2007 Fanberg survey of Haza people with hypertension shows that men with a low voice usually have more offspring than men with a high voice.